How to Argue that God Doesn’t Exist

The problem is that all living things are imperfect. The imperfection-based argument is that, if God is perfect, then why did He create humans and other creatures with so many defects? For example, we are susceptible to many diseases, our bones are fragile, and our bodies and minds gradually degenerate with age. You can also mention that we have an unstable spine, inflexible knees, and pelvic structure that makes childbirth difficult. ^[1] In addition, biological evidence indicates that God does not exist (or that He did not do a good job in creating us, and in that case, we have no reason to do so). worship Him).

• Those who believe in God might argue that God is perfect, and that He made us as perfect as possible. They might also say that what we consider imperfect is actually the deeper purpose of the creator. Please point out the inconsistency here. We can’t live with the hope that one day we’ll find an explanation for why our shoulders and eyes are so bad. Quote from philosopher Vptaire, who wrote a novel that describes people searching for meaning after the earthquake that devastated Paris. We are creatures with an instinct to seek, so it is only natural that we are always looking for and hoping for forms that do not exist.
• Some people may say that in the beginning God created man in perfect form, but after man sinned against God, they became corrupted and immersed in sin, from which death and chaos appeared on this earth. Keep this in mind when arguing.

Presents historical evidence that has replaced supernatural interpretations with natural ones. ^[2] “God of voids” is the common argument of those who believe in the existence of God. This argument argues that although modern science can explain many phenomena, there are still many things that science cannot explain. You could refute this argument by saying that the things we don’t understand are decreasing every year, and while natural interpretations have been replacing theistic interpretations, the supernatural or theistic has never replaced the scientific explanation.

• For example, you might cite evolution to show that science has corrected previous interpretations of the diverse species on earth that centered on God.
• Arguing that religion is often used to explain the unexplained. The ancient Greeks used the god Poseidon to explain earthquakes, which we all know today are caused by the movement of tectonic plates and creating pressure.

Proving the imprecision of creationism. If the existence of this world can be explained in purely scientific terms, then it goes without saying that God created the world. According to Occam Razor Theory, the simplest explanation is often the best. Creationism is the belief that God created the world, usually with a relatively close time frame, about 5,000 – 6,000 years ago. You can rely on the overwhelming amount of convincing evidence that disproves this, such as evolutionary, fossil, radiocarbon and ice core data to argue that God does not exist. ^[3]

• For example, you could say, “We find rocks that are millions, even billions of years old. Does that prove that God doesn’t exist?”
• Some might argue that the earth only appeared ancient because the Great Flood changed the climate and geology so rapidly. However, this cannot account for the millions of craters and supernovas in outer space.